Relegio-Paternalistic: Pengaruh Kepemimpinan Kiai Pesantren dalam Membangun Commitment Organisasi
Abstract
Islamic boarding school is one of the Islamic educational institutions. As a mode of Islamic education, there is educational process which involves various interrelated factors and supports the achievement of the objectives. It seems to be included as mentioned above for a long time and generally superficially understood. Therefore it is necessary to study, what is and how the essence of pesantren itself.
Islamic boarding school is an Islamic education institution that recognized by society with a boarding system (campus) in which students receive religious education through a teaching system or madrasah. That is fully under the sovereignty of a leader or several Kyai with their charismatic characteristics.
Kyai are often assumed to be a conservative, fanatical, puritanical and non-dialogical figure. However, it seems not all kyai have them. Even Kyai are the pioneers of renewal toward the concept of thought. They try to develop an education system in accordance with the demands of every era
Downloads
References
Bruinessen. 1999. NU, Tradisi, Relasi-relasi kuasa, Pencarian Wacana Baru. Yogyakarta: Lkis), 19
Amir, Syafruddin. Pesantren Pembangkit Moral Bangsa. (Online) ( http:// www.pikiranrakyat. com/cetak/2006/072006/03/11wacana01.htm-28k-
Manfred Ziemik. 1990. Pesantren dalam Perubahan Sosial terj. Butche B Soendjoyo. Jakarta: P3M.
Kuntowijoyo. 1990. Paradigma Islam Interpretasi untuk Aksi. Bandung: Mizan.
Soleh Hayat dkk. 1995. Peranan Ulama Dalam Perjuangan Kemerdekaan. Surabaya : PWNU Jatim.
Dhofier, Zamakhsyari 2011. Tradisi Pesantren : Studi Pandangan Hidup Kiyai dan Visinya mengenai masa Depan Indonesia. Jakarta : LP3ES.
Dhofier, Zamakhsyari, 1994. Tradisi Pesantren: Studi Tentang Pandangan Hidup Kiai. Jakarta: LP3ES, 1994.
Nurani Soyomukti. 2015. Teori-teori Pendidikan: Dari Tradisionalis, Neo Liberal, Marxis-Sosialis, hingga Postmodern. Yogyakarta: Ar-Ruz Media
Dewa Gilang. Benarkah Ada Teroris di Pesantren: Tinjauan Pesantren dan Terorisme, (on line) tersedia dalam http://sosbud.kompasiana.com/2012/09/02/benarkah-ada-teroris-di-pesantren-tinjauan-pesantren-dan-terorisme/,
Mujib, Abdul dan Mudzakkir, 2006. Jusuf. Ilmu Pendidikan Islam. Jakarta:Kencana Prenada Media.
Imam Suprayogo. 2007. Kyai danPolitik, Membaca Citra Politik Kyai. Malang: UIN Malang Press.
Mubaraq, Zulfi. 2006.Konspirasi Politik Elit Tradisional di Era Reformasi. Yogyakarta: Aditya Media.
Sukamto.1999. Kepemimpinan Kiai Dalam Pesantren. Jakarta: LP3ES.
Galba, Sindu. 1995. Pesantren Sebagai Wadah Komunikasi. Jakarta: Rieka Cipta.
Majid, Nurcholish. 1992. Bilik-Bilik Pesantren: Sebuah Potret Perjalanan. Jakarta: Paramadina.
Simsek, M.S.,Akgemci, T., & Celik, A. 1998. Pengantar Ilmu Perilaku dan Perilaku dalam Organisasi, Angkara: Gazi Kitabevi.
Garner, C. L, 1998.Team Building and Organizational Effectivenss, Doktora Tez. University of Texas at Austin : The Faculty of Graduate School.
Tjosvold, D.W. &Tjosvold, M.M.1991. Leading The Team Organizaton: How to Create An Enduring Competitive Advantage. New York: Lexington Books
Katzenbach, J. R. & Smith, D. K. 1993. TheWisdom of Teams (Harward Business School Press.
Mohrman, S.A., Cohen, S.G., & Morhman Jr, A.M. 1995. Designing Team-Based Organizations: New Forms for Knowledgework. Jossey-Bass. Asian Journal of Bisnis dan Manajemen
Cohen,S.G.&Bailey, D. E. 1997. What Makes Teamwork: Group Effectiveness Research from the Shop FloortotheExecutiveSuite, Journal of Management, Vol.23(3).
Weber, Max. 2006. Essay in Sociology. Terj. Noorkholis. Sosiologi. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.
Mastuhu,1994. Dinamika Sistem Pendidikan Pesantren, Suatu Kajian tentang Unsur dan Nilai Sistem Pendidikan Pesantren. Jakarta: INIS, 1994
Ismail (Eds)., 2002. Dinamika Pesantren dan Madrasah. Semarang: Pustaka Pelajar.
West, Michael. 2002. Effective Teamwork. Trj. Srikandi Waluyo. Kerjasama Kelompok yang Efektif . Yogyakarta: Kanisius.
Mutiara S. Panggabean, 2004. Manajemen Sumber Daya Manusia. Bogor: Ghalia Indonesia.
John P Meyer and Natalie J.Allen. 1984. Testing The “Side-Bet Theory” of Organizational Commitment : Some Methodological Considerations. Journal of Applied Psychology
Per Dalin, dkk. 1994. How Schools Improve an International Report. Wiltshire: Redwood books, 1994.
Natalie J. Allen and John P. Meyer. 1990. The Measurement and Antecedent of Affective, Continuance and Normative Commitment to The Organization. Journal of Occupational Psychology.
Chris Argyris dalam Djamaluddin Ancok, dkk. 2003. Paradigma Baru Manajemen Sumber Daya Manusia. Ed. A. Usmara. Yogyakarta : Amara Books.
Sugeng Wahyudi. 2004Locus of Control dan Kinerja Bursa, Makalah dosen strategi dan keuangan pada Program MM Undip-82, Semarang, 2004
Wibowo, 2013. Perilaku Dalam Organisasi. Jakarta: PT. Raja Grafindo Persada
Copyright (c) 2019 Hariyanto Hariyanto
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
