Visi Moderat Islam
(Transformasi Dari Perspektif Binnary Opposition Menuju Interdependent Position)
Abstract
Why did the early religion of its potential be a clue to God turn out to be fragmented in a binnary opposition matrix? From this anxiety the author focuses on the Binnary Opposition, which derives two sub-formulations of the problem. First, how to unravel the perspective of binnary opposition, which became the root of religious primordiality? Second, how to put the future religious perspective in interdependent position ?. What is the purpose of the speaker, from the first sub-formulation of the problem, is to explore the process of establishing a binnary opposition perspective in religion, while the second sub-formulation of the problem is to formulate a future religious perplexity in harmony with the moderate vision of Islam. to review the problem formulation we use the Interrelegious studies approach by utilizing cosmothreandic theory of Raymond pannikar. From this approach it is concluded from the formulation of the first problem, that the Islamic discourse which moves on the level of binnary opposition on its essential is Islam in the logos matrix. This matrix necessitates categories such as Substantial Islam and formalists. With this comes the tension between one another. While from the formulation of the second problem, to go to the moderate vision of Islam needs to replace the perspective of Islam that leads to interdependent position. In this sphere Islam is no longer relying on the analysis of binnary opposition but on the vision of justice and humanity.
Downloads
References
Michel Foucalt, The Archeology Of Knowledge And The Discourse On Language, translated from A.M Sheridan Smith (New York: Pantheon Books, 1972).
Jurgen Habermas, Ilmu Dan Tehnologi Sebagai Ideologi (Jakarta: LP3ES, 1990).
Fransisco Budi Hardiman, Kritik Ideologi: Pertautan Pengetahuan Dan Kepentingan (Jogyakarta: Kanisius, 1990).
Louis Althuser, For Max (New York: Pantheon Book, 1969).
Ahmad Baso,Islam Pasca Kolonial: Perselingkuhan Reformisme Agama Kolonialisme dan Liberalisme (Jakarta: Pustaka Afid, 2016).
Amin Abdulllah,”The Intersubjective type of religiosity: a contribution (fresh ijtihad) of Indonesian Islamic Studies to A Multicultural Society”. Makalah ini dipresentasikan di AICIS ke 14 di Balikpapan Kalimantan pada tahun 2014.
Richard C. Martin (ed), Approaches To Islam In Religious Studies. Essay Richard C. Martin,”Islam And Religious Studies: An Introductory Essay” (U.S.A: The University Of Arizona Oress, 1985).
Abdurrahman Wahid, Islamku Islam anda Islam Kita (Jakarta: The Wahid Institut, 2006).
Gerard Hall SM, Multi-Faith Dialogue In Conversation With Raimon Pannikar. Australian Ejournal Of Theology 2. Februari 2004. Hal 1.
Aksin Wijaya, Satu Islam Ragam Epistemologi: Dari Epistemologi Teosentrisme ke Antroposentrisme Cet Ke I (Jogjakarta: Pustaka Pelajar, 2014).
Mark R Worward, Islam Jawa: Kesalehan Normatif Versus Kebatinan. Terj. Hairus Salim Cet ke II (Jogjakarta: LkiS, 2004).
Azyumardi Azra, Renaisan Islam asia Tenggara: Sejarah Wacana Dan Kekuasaan (Bandung: Rosdakarya, 1999).
Budhi Munawar Rahman, Islam Pluralis: Wacana Kesetaraan Kaum Beriman (Jakarta: Paramadina, 2001).
Said Aqiel Siradj, Islam Kebangsaan: Fiqh Demokratik Kaum santri (Jakarta: Pustaka Ciganjur, 1999).
Muslim Abdurrahman: Islam Transformatif (Jakarta: Pustaka Firdaus, 1997).
Azyumardi Azra, Islam Substantif (Bandung: Mizan, 2000).
Harun Nasution, Islam Rasional: Gagasan Dan Pemikiran Cet ke ke IV (Bandung: Mizan, 1996).
Alwi Shihab, Islam Inklusif (Bandung: Mizan, 1997).
Immanuel Kant, The Critique Of Pure Reason. Trans JMD (New York: Promotheus Book, 1990).
Abd al-Jabbar al-Rifa’i, Mabadi’ al-filsafat al-Islam. Juz 2 (Beirut Libanon: Dar al-Hadi, 2001), hal 7.
Hairi Yazdi, Haram al-Wujud: Dirasat Tahliliyat limabadi’i ‘ilmi al-Wujud Muqarin. Diterjemahkan ke bahasa arab oleh Muhammad Abd al-Mun’im al-Haqani (Beirut: Dar al-Raudlah, 1990).
